"AI agent" really rolls off the tongue, doesn't it? Compare that to what's actually under the hood: some straightforward code connecting language models to a toolkit of functions. Ask the LLM to parse user input, trigger the right tools, execute tasks—nothing revolutionary there. Yet slap the "agent" label on it and suddenly everyone's excited. It's the same old wrapper dressed up in fresh terminology. Classic marketing move: take something fairly vanilla and make it sound like the future.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
26 Likes
Reward
26
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterZhang
· 01-13 08:19
That's right, it's just shell marketing, changing the terminology to hype up the concept, and the retail investors get excited.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 01-11 09:10
Basically, it's just a packaging trick. Wrapping function calling with an "agent" shell can fool a bunch of people into paying. What's the real cutting-edge technology? Nothing.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkie
· 01-10 10:55
NGL, this is the current common problem in Web3: everything is dressed up with a "revolutionary" label, and then VC firms start to go wild.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxAddict
· 01-10 10:54
It's another round of putting old wine in new bottles. The name AI agent sounds good, but when you break it down, it's just a combination of LLM and utility libraries—nothing magical.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedNotShrugged
· 01-10 10:53
Well said, just by putting on a new disguise, it becomes cutting-edge technology. This trick is truly unbeatable.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermit
· 01-10 10:48
Basically, it's just a rebrand; no matter how fancy the packaging, the essence can't be changed...
"AI agent" really rolls off the tongue, doesn't it? Compare that to what's actually under the hood: some straightforward code connecting language models to a toolkit of functions. Ask the LLM to parse user input, trigger the right tools, execute tasks—nothing revolutionary there. Yet slap the "agent" label on it and suddenly everyone's excited. It's the same old wrapper dressed up in fresh terminology. Classic marketing move: take something fairly vanilla and make it sound like the future.