The value of Gate Square is not "prediction accuracy," but "thinking transparency."

In many trading communities, content often only shows the results: if it goes up, it's correct; if it goes down, it's wrong. But what impressed me most about Gate Square is that it allows and encourages the process to be displayed. Some people write down their logic in advance, some revise their views in real-time, and others openly review their trades after the market moves against them.

This kind of "thinking transparency" is extremely important for traders. Because what truly determines long-term gains is not occasional correct market calls, but whether the judgment logic can withstand repeated testing. The discussion atmosphere at Gate Square has taught me to stop focusing only on conclusions and instead break down the assumptions behind each viewpoint. #GateSquareOfficialAccountFansExceed30K

At the same time, the interaction in the comment section is also a major advantage of Gate Square. Users of different experience levels communicate under the same content, allowing them to see risk warnings from veterans and intuitive judgments from beginners. This collision of multiple perspectives is itself a form of risk management.

I hope Gate Square always maintains the core principle of "diverse viewpoints but rational discussion," becoming one of the few thinking platforms in the Chinese crypto community.

Looking forward to launching the 【Viewpoint Annotation Mechanism】, such as distinguishing between "short-term/mid-term/macro/emotion posts," so that readers can understand the content's focus more quickly, reduce misinterpretations, and improve the overall quality of discussions.