The rise of artificial intelligence and robotics threatens massive job displacement. But could this crisis actually force governments and corporations to finally implement universal basic income? Several tech leaders and crypto investors think so.
The AI Unemployment Crisis Is Coming—But Maybe UBI Is Too
As AI capabilities accelerate, the specter of technological unemployment grows harder to ignore. Intelligent robots and machine learning systems are encroaching on roles once thought to be safe from automation. This isn’t just speculation—it’s forcing serious people to ask uncomfortable questions: If AI eliminates most jobs, how does society maintain economic stability?
Cryptocurrency investor and AI analyst Nic Carter has outlined a plausible scenario. As artificial intelligence systematically displaces human workers across industries, backlash will inevitably follow. Socialist and anti-establishment movements will gain momentum, demanding systemic change in response to widespread economic displacement. Carter’s thesis suggests that the resolution won’t be incremental policy adjustments—it will be the adoption of universal basic income, funded by wealthy capital holders and enforced through legislation.
Why Would Big Capital Ever Agree to Fund UBI?
It sounds counterintuitive. Why would those who benefit most from automation voluntarily fund income redistribution? Carter and others argue it’s actually a form of self-preservation. In a world where AI has decimated employment, consumer purchasing power collapses unless compensated elsewhere. Without UBI, there’s no one left to buy products or services—making the entire economy unstable for capital holders.
Elon Musk has offered a more optimistic take on the same future. He argues that as productivity from AI-driven systems skyrockets, the cost of goods and services will plummet. Prices for everything from housing to energy could become negligible, creating a post-scarcity environment where material abundance replaces monetary exchange. In response to predictions that 2030 could mark the beginning of this AI-led prosperity, Musk suggested the timeline might compress even further.
The Uncertainty Remains—But the Need Doesn’t
Whether AI achieves the fine motor dexterity and adaptability to fully replace human labor is still debatable. Some tasks may remain resistant to automation for decades. Yet Musk has been advocating for universal basic income since 2017, long before ChatGPT and modern AI agents demonstrated their current capabilities. His conclusion then was stark: “I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.”
That sentiment captures the core tension. Universal basic income may not emerge from enlightened policy design—it may emerge from necessity. Whether that happens through tax redistribution, corporate funding, or cryptocurrency-based protocols remains uncertain. What seems increasingly clear is that some form of income floor will become unavoidable as AI reshapes the economy. The only real question now is how soon.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
When AI Replaces Human Jobs, Will Universal Basic Income Be the Answer?
The rise of artificial intelligence and robotics threatens massive job displacement. But could this crisis actually force governments and corporations to finally implement universal basic income? Several tech leaders and crypto investors think so.
The AI Unemployment Crisis Is Coming—But Maybe UBI Is Too
As AI capabilities accelerate, the specter of technological unemployment grows harder to ignore. Intelligent robots and machine learning systems are encroaching on roles once thought to be safe from automation. This isn’t just speculation—it’s forcing serious people to ask uncomfortable questions: If AI eliminates most jobs, how does society maintain economic stability?
Cryptocurrency investor and AI analyst Nic Carter has outlined a plausible scenario. As artificial intelligence systematically displaces human workers across industries, backlash will inevitably follow. Socialist and anti-establishment movements will gain momentum, demanding systemic change in response to widespread economic displacement. Carter’s thesis suggests that the resolution won’t be incremental policy adjustments—it will be the adoption of universal basic income, funded by wealthy capital holders and enforced through legislation.
Why Would Big Capital Ever Agree to Fund UBI?
It sounds counterintuitive. Why would those who benefit most from automation voluntarily fund income redistribution? Carter and others argue it’s actually a form of self-preservation. In a world where AI has decimated employment, consumer purchasing power collapses unless compensated elsewhere. Without UBI, there’s no one left to buy products or services—making the entire economy unstable for capital holders.
Elon Musk has offered a more optimistic take on the same future. He argues that as productivity from AI-driven systems skyrockets, the cost of goods and services will plummet. Prices for everything from housing to energy could become negligible, creating a post-scarcity environment where material abundance replaces monetary exchange. In response to predictions that 2030 could mark the beginning of this AI-led prosperity, Musk suggested the timeline might compress even further.
The Uncertainty Remains—But the Need Doesn’t
Whether AI achieves the fine motor dexterity and adaptability to fully replace human labor is still debatable. Some tasks may remain resistant to automation for decades. Yet Musk has been advocating for universal basic income since 2017, long before ChatGPT and modern AI agents demonstrated their current capabilities. His conclusion then was stark: “I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.”
That sentiment captures the core tension. Universal basic income may not emerge from enlightened policy design—it may emerge from necessity. Whether that happens through tax redistribution, corporate funding, or cryptocurrency-based protocols remains uncertain. What seems increasingly clear is that some form of income floor will become unavoidable as AI reshapes the economy. The only real question now is how soon.