Want to ensure the legitimacy of Meme coins? It's basically impossible. Once the market cap grows large, fork projects naturally start to divert attention.
On-chain, everything is there, but there's no real "protection." The coins you don't sell will always be sold by someone else. That's just how this circle is.
Whenever a new Meme coin emerges, you can see two clear groups of people: those who started early and keep reducing their positions as the price rises, and latercomers who are afraid to buy at high levels. This difference in mentality has led to a phenomenon—the speed at which studios launch new projects is astonishing.
The logic is simple: even if you lose money chasing new projects, the loss is limited. But what if you buy in at a high level? That's true bleeding.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainGriller
· 13h ago
After all this time with meme coins, I've seen through it all. The fork traders are simply unbeatable.
Honestly, no one can protect your coins; they're all doomed to mirror trades.
The early investors who knew when to take profits understood the game, while later entrants are the ones who truly lose everything.
View OriginalReply0
GreenCandleCollector
· 16h ago
Haha, this is the fate of memes—forks everywhere.
Legitimacy? Wake up, there's no such thing on the chain.
I've seen early traders reduce their positions, and I’ve seen plenty of others do the same—it's just a matter of psychological readiness.
With so many new projects, the risk is indeed a bit lower. It's much better than catching a falling knife at the top.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 16h ago
New projects cut new leeks, old projects cut old leeks, anyway, it's all about cutting.
---
With so many forks, who the hell can still hold onto the original meme coins?
---
The early investors who got in early ran away very quickly, the later ones are the real fools.
---
The phrase "no protection on the chain" really hits hard; your coins are not really your coins.
---
The studio's opening speed is ridiculously fast, I can't even tell which one is real anymore.
---
Chasing in at high levels is suicide; why haven't these leeks learned yet?
---
Basically, meme coins are just roulette bets, betting on who can run the fastest.
---
Protecting legitimacy? Dream on, the next fork is already on the way.
---
Limited losses vs bleeding, the difference is huge; I choose to wait and see.
---
Look clearly, this is just a leek harvesting field.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForAirdrops
· 16h ago
Oh, this is Web3. There is no real moat.
Early buyers who bought the dip saw the bullish trend run away, while later holders held on tightly. Studios exploited the situation by creating forks, and the cycle of tricks repeats.
Instead of chasing high prices, it's better to bet on new projects. At least there's a bottom line to losses.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoFear
· 16h ago
Haha, it's the same story again. Fork trading is always on the horizon.
Early on, reduce positions to profit from the spread; later, hold on stubbornly and cut losses—classic binary thinking.
Instead of waiting to die, why not try your luck with new projects?
In this circle, there's no loyalty, only returns.
Really, those who chase high prices are all cannon fodder.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 16h ago
That's why I never chase highs. I just laugh when I see friends buying at the top.
---
Fork projects are everywhere. Trying to protect your moat is useless. I should have seen through it long ago.
---
New projects may be stubborn and stubborn, but the losses are indeed controllable, unlike those who chase highs and suffer real losses.
---
I've seen many early investors reduce their positions this way. Smart people are doing it like this.
---
The statement that there's no protection on the chain is very harsh. The crypto world is just a naked jungle law.
---
Every time a new Meme comes out, I watch others enter at high levels later, and then there's no follow-up.
---
The studio's speed of cutting leeks is getting faster and faster. Anyway, new projects always make more money than chasing highs.
---
There are indeed people who sell your coins if you don't sell. This statement is just too absolute.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiChef
· 16h ago
The mindset of early accumulation is completely different from later stages, no wonder fork markets keep emerging one after another.
Want to ensure the legitimacy of Meme coins? It's basically impossible. Once the market cap grows large, fork projects naturally start to divert attention.
On-chain, everything is there, but there's no real "protection." The coins you don't sell will always be sold by someone else. That's just how this circle is.
Whenever a new Meme coin emerges, you can see two clear groups of people: those who started early and keep reducing their positions as the price rises, and latercomers who are afraid to buy at high levels. This difference in mentality has led to a phenomenon—the speed at which studios launch new projects is astonishing.
The logic is simple: even if you lose money chasing new projects, the loss is limited. But what if you buy in at a high level? That's true bleeding.