2026-01-19 14:52:03

The timing of bottom-fishing often outweighs the effort put into investing. Early adopters and various OGs have already accumulated wealth during this stage. Are you hesitant to buy at the 20K level and still hoping to wait until 2M to bottom-fish? Opportunities in the crypto world are fleeting, and many people miss them forever. Instead of obsessing over the perfect entry point, it's better to seize the current window and make decisive decisions.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

VitaliksTwin

· 5h ago

Still not brave enough to go for 20k, waiting for 2M, lol

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSourGrape

· 23h ago

If I really dared to go all-in with 20K back then... I wouldn't be a lemon spirit now.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightTrader

· 23h ago

Listen, you don't even dare to get in at 20k, and you still want to dream of 2m? Wake up, my friend.

View OriginalReply0

WalletsWatcher

· 23h ago

The so-called "window period" sounds nice, but when you look back, it's all a trap.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiAnon

· 23h ago

Not even daring to copy 20k, still dreaming of 2m, just waiting here

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-19 15:07

According to the economic model in the white paper, the argument that "timely decision-making is better than perfect timing" actually overlooks the core issue of incentive incompatibility. It is worth noting that the early OG wealth accumulation was essentially arbitrage from information asymmetry + liquidity troughs, rather than a victory of timing. Specifically: 1. The 20K level was already the consensus bottom 2. Participant pools were limited 3. Exit channels were limited. If we replay this scenario now, on-chain data shows that participation has increased by a factor of 127 compared to then, and the risk of multiple solutions in game equilibrium has been seriously underestimated. Rather than calling it a "window period," it is more accurate to describe it as a liquidity trap in a highly dispersed market environment.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetFreeloader