Like God on Earth: Trump plans to create an alternative UN under full personal control

According to Bloomberg agency, an American politician has developed a project for a new international organization that, in its structure, differs radically from the traditional global governance system. This initiative raises serious questions about the nature of international cooperation and the principles of democratic governance on the world stage.

Full control over $1 billion per year: the structure of the new “Peace Council”

According to the proposed charter of the organization, the initiator will retain absolute authority over all key decisions. Personal approval remains a necessary condition for any decision to take effect, regardless of voting results. At the same time, the organization’s financial flows will also be under personal control.

Participating countries must contribute significant amounts to obtain status. Those states that donate more than $1 billion in the first year of the structure’s operation will receive lifetime membership and privileged status. Other members will receive membership for a limited period — a maximum of three years with the possibility of revising the terms.

Membership at a price: a two-tier access system

The membership system reflects a straightforward logic: financial investments directly correlate with the level of privileges received and the long-term nature of the status. Officially, decisions within the organization are made by majority vote among participants, but this democratic mechanism remains purely formal, as any decision requires approval at the highest level.

Who will win and who will lose: criticism of the alternative organization

International observers view this initiative as an attempt to create a competing structure that will undermine the authority of existing international cooperation mechanisms. The official status of the organization will only be granted with the consent of at least three states, but the long-term viability of such a project remains highly uncertain.

The key point is that after the initiator’s political career ends — in three years, when the political mandate expires — this entire structure could be dismantled or transferred to private management. According to analysts, the first country likely to join the initiative could be Ukraine, although its funding remains highly uncertain.