Speaking of notifications, it seems that our generation is always chasing the "next big opportunity," but rarely stops to think: when that opportunity truly arrives, what gives us the confidence to seize it? Is it faster internet speeds, more timely information, or more substantial capital? Staring at the increasingly complex points systems and guild dynamics on @ferra_protocol, I suddenly realize that the answer might be more unsettling: whether we can grasp the future may depend on whether we are already accustomed to and trusting a whole new social structure defined by code—an "in-protocol society." Ferra is becoming an early incubator for this new type of social relationship, or more plainly—an extensive "stress test" for social adaptability. Think about it: what is our current trust built upon? Contracts, laws, corporate brands, personal introductions. But in a fast-moving, globally collaborative crypto world, these traditional anchors become slow and cumbersome. Protocols like Ferra seem to be trying to answer an ancient new question with algorithms: how can a group of anonymous, globally distributed strangers establish trust-based, measurable, and even compoundable relationships solely through on-chain behavior? Its points system isn’t just about giving out tokens; it’s more like drawing a detailed "social relationship topology map." Providing liquidity is establishing trust with an asset pool; participating in guild tasks is building collaboration with small groups; speaking up in the community to help others is accumulating personal credibility nodes. All these actions are converted into points of varying weights, recorded on an immutable ledger. Ultimately, your address is no longer just a wallet but a "digital persona" with a verifiable social relationship graph. This is the real underlying logic that makes people anxious. Ferra might not just be a trading tool; it’s more like a social experiment: when traditional social capital (favors, status, institutional endorsements) is flattened into transparent, composable on-chain data, how will the sources and distribution of power shift? Those who early enter and actively interact according to its rules are actually accumulating a new kind of "protocol-native social capital." This capital isn’t directly money, but it could determine in the future: which top-tier investment DAOs you can join, which new projects you have the right to participate in early governance, or even how cheaply you can borrow funds from the protocol itself. Most of us are still evaluating it with "financial models," tangled up in APY and the cost-effectiveness of small tasks. It’s like trying to weigh a laser beam with a scale—that tool is completely wrong. The real value game may have already shifted to another level: whoever adapts earliest to this "trust based on verifiable behavior" survival method is more likely to become a "core node" in the future crypto-native society. When a truly decentralized giant rises in the future, it will need to recruit not "shareholders," but "consensus citizens." Its screening mechanism will likely involve analyzing behavioral data accumulated from protocols like Ferra, identifying those addresses that have already proven familiarity with on-chain collaboration, community-building ability, and good reputation. By then, the huge sum of dormant funds in your account won’t be able to buy this unparticipated "history of digital social relationships." Therefore, Ferra’s leaderboard may not just be a simple airdrop ranking, but an early health report of "digital social adaptability." Your position on the list doesn’t directly represent wealth, but it might hint at how many "behavioral habits" you still need to learn to reach the future’s new world driven by code and consensus. Do you want to continue being a tourist holding an old map, commenting on distant scenery, or start now, trying to learn how to co-create a small oasis with others in this initial, somewhat rudimentary "protocol society"? History doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes. The last paradigm shift gave early internet adopters an advantage. This time, it’s about "on-chain verifiable collaboration." Our anxiety is fundamentally a deep fear of potentially becoming "digital social traditionalists." Are you ready? The new society’s immigration bureau may already be silently scoring with points, and we haven’t even seen what the visa looks like yet.申子辰村委党支部