Why does each cycle produce a batch of "lowered barrier" products, but very few actually stick around in the end?

Because most so-called simplifications are essentially just hiding complexity, not eliminating it.
Recently, I’ve been looking at @easydotfunX. Its approach is very straightforward—making it easier for users to participate in on-chain activities. Whether it's interactions, tasks, or asset operations, it compresses steps as much as possible so that ordinary users can join without needing to understand too much underlying logic.
This sounds very correct, but the problem lies precisely here. When barriers are lowered, do the participating actions truly have value, or are they just short-term activities driven by incentives?
Many similar products ultimately become task distribution platforms, where users complete actions to earn rewards, not because they have genuine needs.
The key of easydotfunX isn’t how many people it brings in, but whether those people stay afterward.
If it only improves participation efficiency, it solves the entry point issue. But if it can turn these actions into real usage, then it truly has the potential to become infrastructure.
Lowering barriers has never been the difficult part; the challenge is to retain high-quality behavior under low barriers.
@easydotfunX @wallchain #Ad #Affiliate @TermMaxFi