Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
The new project Origin is interesting. With a market cap of 800 million, but the business logic is eye-catching—completely copying the gameplay of OHM.
Do you know what OHM is? It’s a legendary project from five years ago, and its market cap still remains stable at 450 million. Using the same model, it’s still able to find new meaning today.
What does this imply? Looking at the entire crypto market, how many projects have survived five years? In the big waves, nine out of ten things have died. A model that can last this long inherently proves its resilience.
Origin daring to directly reuse this logic shows that the founding team has a very thorough understanding of market principles. Innovation doesn’t always guarantee victory; sometimes, proven strategies become even more valuable in a new era.
OHM has fallen so much, and Origin still dares to use the same tactics. Honestly, it's a gamble on whether someone will come to take over later
Surviving five years ≠ making money with the model, it just shows that the work of cutting leeks is indeed long-lasting...
Wait for the rebound and then leave. Don't think about bottom-fishing; history has shown me there are always lower points
Copying stuff from five years ago now actually becomes an advantage? That logic is a bit extreme.
Is the 99% death rate figure serious? It feels like it should be higher.
Is Origin really just lazy or has it truly understood the pattern? It's a bit hard to tell.
Proven strategies > blind innovation. That sounds great, but what about in actual combat?
Alright, I support this copy-paste approach. Things that last a long time must have some substance.
Projects that have survived for 5 years are few and far between. If you think about it this way, copying a model that has been active for 5 years is indeed reliable.
Stop talking about innovation; the market just loves this old trick.
Wait, isn't this just a rebranded OHM? Why pay extra to buy this...
Origin's move is really daring; they can raise money just by copying. If I were the founder, I would do the same.