Walrus can quickly build a global node network and break through 3PB of storage capacity. What is the secret weapon behind this? Technology is one aspect, but a more direct driving force is: economic incentives.



The earliest miners and node operators have invested real money in hard drives, servers, and bandwidth costs. They seek not just spiritual rewards like "supporting a great dream," but tangible, measurable profits. Currently, this income mainly comes from protocol inflation rewards in the form of $WALRUS tokens.

But there is a sharp issue in front of us—the protocol relying on inflation incentives will eventually face it: as token rewards gradually decrease (whether through mechanism-based halvings or the decline in token price itself), when the "good days of subsidies" are gone, can this network survive based on its true value? Can it withstand the inevitable "winter of subsidies"?

**What is the current situation**

Currently, the main income for Walrus nodes comes from $WALRUS block rewards earned after storing and verifying data. Essentially, the protocol is using its potential future value—namely, the token—to purchase the "data storage and verification" services provided by nodes today. This model is very common in the early stages of Web3 projects, and there’s no problem with it.

But for this model to operate healthily, there is an implicit prerequisite: the price of $WALRUS must remain stable or continue to rise. Only then can the node’s revenue in fiat currency cover real costs like hardware depreciation, electricity, and operations, and still make a profit.

Once the price of $WALRUS starts to fall…
WAL-5.27%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
ShortingEnthusiast
· 01-20 22:28
It's the same old story again. Inflation-driven projects will eventually die, and Walrus can't escape either. When the coin price drops, the project has to shut down—that's the truth.
View OriginalReply0
ContractFreelancer
· 01-20 03:23
It's the same old trick again, pouring out subsidies wildly in the early stages, and when the hype dies down and the price crashes, it's a race to see who can run faster. Walrus is no different from those previous storage projects.
View OriginalReply0
0xSoulless
· 01-19 15:41
It's the same old trick again, first smashing coins to incentivize vampires to enter, really thinking people are fools. Once the coin price drops, these miners will turn around and run, and then we'll see who will come to protect the network for you.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuilder
· 01-19 15:37
It's the same old trick again; the real test is when the subsidies are withdrawn.
View OriginalReply0
HodlVeteran
· 01-19 15:34
Damn, it's the same old script of inflation and cutting leeks. I'm already tired of it since 2017...
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin