🔥Recent on-chain trading terminal $Genius @GeniusTerminal trading volume is mainly concentrated on the BSC chain, while Solana ecosystem trading volume share is significantly lower, showing obvious cross-chain differentiation.
📚According to public data: 2026-03-09 (Weekly data) EVM trading volume: $556,916,284 Solana trading volume: $22,537,044 Total trading volume: $579,453,328 2026-03-14 (Daily data) EVM trading volume: $146,789,414 Solana trading volume: $6,836,838 Total trading volume: $153,626,252 ✨Due to the project's airdrop activity distributing a fixed 10 million points weekly, calculated from recent weeks' trading volume, the average cost per point is approximately $0.03-0.08/point (distribution weight varies by trading volume) From a structural perspective: EVM (primarily BSC) trading volume accounts for approximately 95% Solana trading volume accounts for only approximately 4%-5% This means $Genius 's current core liquidity comes almost entirely from the EVM ecosystem, especially BSC users, while Solana users contribute very limited trading depth. From a market structure perspective, this phenomenon may be related to several factors: Apart from CZ as project advisor Yzhilabs' investment creating great expectations among traders, 1️⃣ BSC users are more sensitive to high-frequency trading and airdrop activities BSC has consistently been one of the most active public chains in the on-chain "volume farming ecosystem," with users showing high participation in trading incentives and airdrop rules. 2️⃣ EVM wallet transfers and fund migration are more convenient A large amount of DeFi capital already exists within the EVM ecosystem, with lower migration costs to Genius. 3️⃣ Solana ecosystem users' habits are concentrated on native DEXs Platforms such as Jupiter and Raydium have already formed strong liquidity, making it difficult for new trading platforms to rapidly capture market share. Genius's trading volume appears cross-chain, but in reality remains a "BSC-driven platform."
🔥Recent on-chain trading terminal $Genius @GeniusTerminal trading volume is mainly concentrated on the BSC chain, while Solana ecosystem trading volume share is significantly lower, showing obvious cross-chain differentiation.
📚According to public data:
2026-03-09 (Weekly data)
EVM trading volume: $556,916,284
Solana trading volume: $22,537,044
Total trading volume: $579,453,328
2026-03-14 (Daily data)
EVM trading volume: $146,789,414
Solana trading volume: $6,836,838
Total trading volume: $153,626,252
✨Due to the project's airdrop activity distributing a fixed 10 million points weekly, calculated from recent weeks' trading volume, the average cost per point is approximately $0.03-0.08/point (distribution weight varies by trading volume)
From a structural perspective:
EVM (primarily BSC) trading volume accounts for approximately 95%
Solana trading volume accounts for only approximately 4%-5%
This means $Genius 's current core liquidity comes almost entirely from the EVM ecosystem, especially BSC users, while Solana users contribute very limited trading depth.
From a market structure perspective, this phenomenon may be related to several factors:
Apart from CZ as project advisor Yzhilabs' investment creating great expectations among traders,
1️⃣ BSC users are more sensitive to high-frequency trading and airdrop activities
BSC has consistently been one of the most active public chains in the on-chain "volume farming ecosystem," with users showing high participation in trading incentives and airdrop rules.
2️⃣ EVM wallet transfers and fund migration are more convenient
A large amount of DeFi capital already exists within the EVM ecosystem, with lower migration costs to Genius.
3️⃣ Solana ecosystem users' habits are concentrated on native DEXs
Platforms such as Jupiter and Raydium have already formed strong liquidity, making it difficult for new trading platforms to rapidly capture market share.
Genius's trading volume appears cross-chain, but in reality remains a "BSC-driven platform."