The RWA market is expected to reach $400B by 2030, representing an increase of over 1,000%

Gate News, April 10: Market maker Keyrock and tokenization platform Securitize released a joint report on April 9, predicting that the distributed RWA market that can be freely transferred on-chain will grow from about $29 billion today to $400 billion by 2030 under a baseline scenario, an increase of more than 1,000%. A broader blockchain-tracked RWA market is expected to reach $5 trillion over the same period. The report covers five asset classes: U.S. Treasuries, private credit, equities, commodities, and alternative funds. Among them, tokenized perpetual futures contracts are the fastest-growing on-chain channel: over six months, trading volume increased 40x to a monthly average of $67 billion, rising from 0.1% of total on-chain derivatives to 10.1%. It is expected to reach 50% of total on-chain derivatives by 2028. The report also notes that tokenized Treasury yields, since mid-2024, have been on more days than the DeFi benchmark stablecoin lending rates for 64% of the days, and in the first quarter of 2026 they reach 98%. Currently, tokenized RWAs account for less than 0.1% of the global $4 trillion tokenizable market.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third-party sources and is for reference only. It does not represent the views or opinions of Gate and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Virtual asset trading involves high risk. Please do not rely solely on the information on this page when making decisions. For details, see the Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
ABigHeartvip
· 04-10 04:00
Market maker Keyrock and tokenization platform Securitize jointly forecast that the on-chain transferable distributed RWA market will grow from $29 billion to $400 billion, an increase of over 1,000%. It is expected that by 2028, RWA perpetual contracts will account for 50% of the total on-chain derivatives. Currently, tokenized RWA accounts for less than 0.1% of the global tokenizable market.
View OriginalReply0