Tom Lee Calls AI Capex Fear Bullish Sign Before Fed Meeting

NVDA0.41%
CSCO1.45%
Key Takeaways
  • Tom Lee called market AI capex fear a bullish sign before the Federal Reserve's July meeting.
  • Lee argues widespread skepticism about the AI cycle shows it still has room to run.
  • Traders price a one-in-three chance of a rate hike, up from 16% a week earlier.

Tom Lee, head of research at Fundstrat Global Advisors, called the market's AI capex fear a bullish sign this week, stating he does not read it as a warning of an approaching top. Lee's view contrasts with a warning from Steve Eisman, known for shorting the 2008 housing bubble, who said this week that markets could fall sharply if hyperscalers cut artificial intelligence spending. Lee argues that widespread skepticism about the AI trade shows the cycle still has room to run, as investors rarely question a story's durability right before it peaks. Lee spoke a day before the Federal Reserve's two-day July meeting begins, as traders priced roughly a one-in-three chance of a hike, up from 16% a week earlier.

Lee Argues Widespread Skepticism Signals Continued AI Cycle Growth

Lee flips the usual market logic, arguing that widespread skepticism about the AI trade shows the cycle still has room to run. "The fact that many people are saying that is a sign that we're not at a top because people are questioning the longevity of the cycle ... I think that's actually a bullish thing," Lee said on CNBC. In Lee's view, investors rarely question a story's durability right before it peaks.

Eisman Warns Market Could Fall on Hyperscaler Spending Cuts

Lee's view directly counters Eisman's capex warning, which centers on Nvidia's exposure to hyperscaler spending. Eisman put the risk in blunt terms on CNBC: "I think the market will go straight down. At the end of the day, it all boils down to, in a sense, Nvidia." Lee sees that outcome as unlikely soon.

Fed Two-Day July Meeting Approaches as Rate Hike Odds Rise

Lee spoke a day before the Federal Reserve's two-day July meeting begins. Traders currently price roughly a one-in-three chance of a hike, up from 16% a week earlier. Lee expects the Fed to lean on quantitative tightening instead, seeing a balance sheet shrink as a way to pressure growth without deliberately slowing the economy.

Lee Draws Parallel to Late 1990s Internet Stock Skepticism

Lee draws a historical parallel, comparing today's AI durability doubts to the late 1990s, when investors repeatedly questioned Cisco and other internet stocks. That skepticism, historically, preceded further gains rather than a collapse. The Fed's rate decision this week will test Lee's read, as will the next round of hyperscaler earnings, part of the broader AI spending arms race Wall Street is tracking.

FAQ

What did Tom Lee say about AI capex fears?

Tom Lee, head of research at Fundstrat Global Advisors, called the market's AI capex fear a bullish sign this week. He stated he does not read it as a warning of an approaching top, arguing that widespread skepticism about the AI trade shows the cycle still has room to run.

Why does Steve Eisman think markets could fall sharply?

Steve Eisman warned this week that markets could fall sharply if hyperscalers cut artificial intelligence spending. Eisman's warning centers on Nvidia's exposure to hyperscaler spending, stating on CNBC that "the market will go straight down" and "it all boils down to, in a sense, Nvidia."

What are traders pricing for the Fed's July meeting?

Traders currently price roughly a one-in-three chance of a hike at the Federal Reserve's two-day July meeting, up from 16% a week earlier. Lee expects the Fed to lean on quantitative tightening instead of a rate hike.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third-party sources and is for reference only. It does not represent the views or opinions of Gate and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Virtual asset trading involves high risk. Please do not rely solely on the information on this page when making decisions. For details, see the Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
No comments