Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

Circle's new regulation: Can USDC be used to buy guns? The answer lies in the legal details.

robot
Abstract generation in progress

[Coin World] Circle, the company behind USDC, recently took action – modifying the user agreement to draw a line on firearms and ammunition transactions.

What do the new regulations say? In simple terms: it is illegal to buy guns using USDC, but there is no problem with purchasing through legal channels. Circle can now monitor such transactions and will directly intercept them if necessary. It sounds strict, but there is actually a loophole - as long as it complies with local laws, it is still possible to buy.

This matter has caused a stir in the United States. Supporters say it is a respect for the Second Amendment of the Constitution (the right to bear arms). Wyoming Senator Lummis directly stated: “Circle aligns with the law, preventing the financial system from becoming a weapon against legal gun owners.” Of course, there are opposing voices, but the mainstream opinion leans positive.

The timing is very delicate. In July this year, the United States just signed the “GENIUS Act” specifically to regulate stablecoins, and Circle's CEO Jeremy Allaire and Tether's boss Paolo Ardoino were both present to witness it. Now Circle is adjusting its policies, and outsiders speculate that it may be in response to regulatory pressures, or perhaps to build a good relationship with the new government—after all, in terms of stablecoin regulation, Washington's attitude has changed, and businesses need to keep up with the pace.

To put it broadly, this matter reflects a trend: it is becoming increasingly difficult for cryptocurrency payment tools to thrive independently, as fintech and traditional legal frameworks are colliding at an accelerated pace.

USDC0.01%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OnChain_Detectivevip
· 53m ago
hmm suspicious timing... circle's been under heavy scrutiny lately
Reply0
MemeCoinSavantvip
· 53m ago
bullish af on decentralization narratives rn tbh
Reply0
TrustlessMaximalistvip
· 14h ago
Is this the level of regulatory strength? Let my A-shares laugh for a while.
View OriginalReply0
TokenStormvip
· 14h ago
The backtesting cost of this monitoring data is outrageously high.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBrovip
· 14h ago
As expected, false neutrality.
View OriginalReply0
GasGasGasBrovip
· 14h ago
Having a gun is also management, right? Manage, manage, manage.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLabvip
· 14h ago
Another idiot-level permission contract, the monitoring program is directly written in.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTonguevip
· 15h ago
Can monitoring really be reliable?
View OriginalReply0
RamenStackervip
· 15h ago
With this level of regulation, they still want to rebel.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)