2025-12-21 10:21:51

The PIPPIN project has a lot of participants, and many have suffered losses. Have you noticed that the funding rate has always remained negative? Since its launch, it has hardly ever turned positive, which is quite ridiculous.

In fact, most people can't afford spot trading, but they feel that the cost-effectiveness of going long on futures is higher. Since the beginning, they've been going long all the way to now; although they've incurred quite a few losses from funding fees, the leverage effect of futures is still attractive compared to holding spot directly. However, the prerequisite is that you have to withstand the volatility—this coin is not gentle.

PIPPIN-12.91%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GetRichLeek

· 18h ago

Negative funding fees are tormenting, if I had known, I would have just bought the dip in Spot --- In the end, using futures leverage still got me played for suckers by the market maker, this is fate --- Always negative funding fees? This is really off, maybe it's time to run --- I couldn't stand the fluctuation and have long been Rekt out, this devil coin PIPPIN is truly something --- High cost-performance ratio? Hehe, wait until the lever flattens you out to know what cost means --- Looking at the Candlestick support seems pretty solid, but the on-chain data has long been lying --- Negative funding fees for so long, those going long are just big suckers --- It was actually FOMO that got me in, now I can only hold on for dear life --- Big fluctuation = market maker harvests quickly, if you don't have skills, don't touch futures --- Technically it looks like I can buy the dip, but I always feel there's lying in ambush

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 18h ago

nah the persistent negative funding rates on PIPPIN? that's classic manipulation signature right there. traced the wallet clustering patterns and something doesn't add up

Reply0

GweiTooHigh

· 18h ago

Negative funding fees have been entrenched like this, it should have been run away by now haha Futures leverage is enticing, but this fluctuation really torments people How are there still people jumping into this PIPPIN pit The funding fees have been a loss until now, it's better to just lie flat with Spot To put it bluntly, it's still greed, insisting on squeezing through the futures path.

View OriginalReply0

FUDwatcher

· 18h ago

The negative funding rate keeps pumping, who would dare to go all in? Are those who invested now regretting it? The funding rate is making people nauseous; futures leverage is enjoyable, but one big dump could wipe everything out. This wave of PIPPIN's market looks dangerous. Most people actually have too strong of a gambling nature. Futures profits are tempting, but the risks are even more tempting. With such large fluctuations in this coin, leveraged players should have been aware. Having a negative funding rate for so long, what problem does that indicate? Those who can't handle the fluctuations should just obediently buy spot.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#2025GateYearEndSummary
34.96K Popularity
#CryptoMarketMildlyRebounds
490 Popularity
#GoldPrintsNewATH
74 Popularity
#BOJRateHikesBackontheTable
38 Popularity
#2026CryptoOutlook
82 Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
07860786
MC:$3.65KHolders:2
0.14%
2
wlwife less
MC:$3.54KHolders:1
0.00%
3
oxSunoxSun
MC:$3.56KHolders:1
0.00%
4
GSNOWGate Snow
MC:$3.56KHolders:1
0.00%
5
ReveillonFeliz Ano Novo
MC:$3.64KHolders:3
0.25%

Sitemap