🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
When regulators reshape corporate obligations, the line between policy guidance and taxation becomes blurred. Recent developments show governments worldwide examining how leading semiconductor firms manage international revenue streams—particularly those tied to restricted markets. Nvidia, as a critical player in AI infrastructure and GPU manufacturing, faces scrutiny over its China operations and profit allocation. The question isn't purely semantic: whether framed as regulatory compliance, national security measures, or revenue-sharing arrangements, these demands signal a shift in how states approach major technology corporations. This precedent could reshape how multinational firms structure their global operations, especially in sectors deemed strategically important. For the crypto and blockchain industry watching from the sidelines, such regulatory moves underscore an uncomfortable reality—government oversight of corporate profit flows is expanding, and the enforcement mechanisms remain fluid. What starts with semiconductors rarely stays confined to one sector.