The gas fee structure of the Ethereum mainnet is indeed worth following. Recent data shows that even small operations incur significant costs—transferring funds at the level of 0.01U has a transaction fee as high as 0.03U, resulting in a huge rate disparity.

However, this has also led to a phenomenon: L2 solutions are becoming the mainstream choice. In contrast, the fees of Layer 2 networks such as Arbitrum and Optimism are much more user-friendly, which is causing the Mainnet to gradually evolve into the role of a settlement layer.

From the perspective of the competitive landscape, the Ethereum ecosystem's system is actually quite complete. Compared to other public chains, many competing chains, although cheaper in transaction fees, show a significant gap in ecosystem depth, security, and liquidity. Some high-fee public chains have even become breeding grounds for gray industries due to insufficient ecological driving force.

Overall, users with an Ethereum ecosystem have gained the optimal option - they can complete large settlements on the Mainnet and also conduct daily transactions through L2. The maturity of this layered architecture is difficult for other public chains to replicate.