🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Over the years, I've seen too many ups and downs on the chain. From Bitcoin's cyclical fluctuations to the iterative development of the DeFi ecosystem, I've become increasingly aware of one issue: the tools that can truly withstand market storms are precisely the simplest ones—stablecoins.
When USDV was launched, I paid attention. Initially, it carried the halo of an algorithmic stablecoin, backed by major capital, but I always felt something was off. Algorithms are poetic in a bull market, but once a bear market arrives, they can become the first domino to fall. The collapse in 2022 still leaves many with lingering fears.
So when I heard that in 2025 it would upgrade to version 2.0 and fully shift to over-collateralization, my first reaction was: finally, some peace of mind.
This iteration is not just a technical optimization; fundamentally, it's a shift in thinking. The old model relied on algorithms and external liquidity to maintain peg, while the new approach lays down real collateral on-chain—assets like TRX, BTC can all be verified on-chain, clear at a glance. For those who have experienced many "black box" operations, transparency is the biggest reassurance.
USDV 2.0 has already undergone five rounds of security audits, with reputable institutions like CertiK and Chainsecurity involved. I’ve also verified a few collateral records on-chain myself; the ability to independently verify is something many centralized stablecoins simply cannot provide. In balancing decentralization and trustworthiness, this solution has found a relatively solid position.