2025-12-25 00:21:12

The design logic of stablecoins determines their vitality. Some projects choose full fiat collateralization, but this is essentially a centralized approach—relying on traditional financial systems. Others pursue a pure algorithmic route, but the result is often extremely volatile prices.

USDD's approach is different. It adopts a hybrid model of crypto asset collateralization combined with algorithmic regulation, walking on two legs. On one hand, issuance must be supported by a sufficient asset pool—mainstream cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are included, with collateralization ratios maintained above 150%, providing real stability guarantees. On the other hand, smart contracts monitor the market 24/7; as soon as the price deviates from $1, the minting or burning mechanism is immediately activated to bring the price back. This automatic adjustment mechanism is much faster than manual intervention and more transparent.

The development of the ecosystem determines how far stablecoins can go. Currently, USDD has integrated with over 50 DeFi projects, NFT platforms, and blockchain games, covering scenarios such as trading, wealth management, payments, and asset purchases. Users experience smaller slippage during transactions, can earn additional income through liquidity mining, and even use USDD for payments and settlements in the metaverse. This indicates that the prosperity of the ecosystem is not just a number but directly affects the actual user experience.

From a broader perspective, stablecoins have long become the infrastructure of the crypto market, and demand will only increase. The decentralized nature of USDD aligns perfectly with industry development trends. In the short term, circulation will see phased growth; in the medium term, plans are in place to cover more public chains to enable cross-chain circulation; in the long term, as regulations become more standardized, the space for decentralized stablecoins will expand increasingly. The competition in this track is fierce, but the opportunities are clearly there.

USDD0.02%

BTC0.61%

ETH0.1%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PoolJumper

· 3h ago

A 150% collateralization rate sounds stable, but can it really hold up... --- It's USDD again, is this time really different? --- There are over 50 projects in the ecosystem, sounds lively, but how's the actual usage? --- Pure algorithmic failures are too common; this hybrid model seems more reliable --- The story of decentralized stablecoins has been told for a long time, who’s really pocketing the money? --- 150% collateral plus smart regulation sounds perfect, but who takes the blame when the market crashes? --- The metaverse part is a bit uncertain... are people still playing now? --- Talking up a storm, but the key is the actual circulating volume --- Cross-chain coverage is a plus, but competitors are not sitting idle --- Small slippage yields are attractive, this temptation is indeed strong --- Algorithmic automatic regulation is faster than manual intervention, that statement is a bit superficial... --- Great opportunities in the sector, but many stablecoins have failed; who will be the last laugh?

View OriginalReply0

MidnightMEVeater

· 3h ago

Good morning, 3 a.m. A 150% collateral ratio sounds sincere, but this algorithm automatically adjusts... Forget it, it's just another midnight arbitrage in the robot playground. The small gains from liquidity mining have already been eaten up by sandwich attacks.

View OriginalReply0

governance_lurker

· 4h ago

A 150% collateralization rate sounds reassuring, but on the other hand, hasn't USDC been doing the same thing for a long time? What's the difference?

View OriginalReply0

WenMoon42

· 4h ago

A 150% collateralization ratio sounds good, but can it actually run stably in practice?

View OriginalReply0