2025-12-25 02:23:20

Here's an interesting pattern worth watching: certain exchanges have a knack for suppressing what should be the most obvious billion-dollar assets, keeping them under 4 million in volume for weeks straight. Then once things inevitably flip over a billion? Suddenly everyone's crying conspiracy. It's theater, really. The game has its own rhythm—stay tuned for how this one plays out.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CountdownToBroke

· 8h ago

Exchanges are so slick with their tricks, lowering trading volume feels like magic... Once the reversal happens, they start shifting blame again, hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

StakeTillRetire

· 8h ago

Players have all seen through it, but it's just the same old tricks from the exchanges.

View OriginalReply0

GasDevourer

· 8h ago

Bro, I've seen through this trick a long time ago. Exchanges are just playing psychological games.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiHeir

· 8h ago

It should be pointed out that this phenomenon of exchanges suppressing trading volume fundamentally contradicts the decentralized value consensus outlined in Satoshi Nakamoto's white paper. On-chain data indicates that genuine market liquidity is not arbitrarily suppressed—there must be a mechanistic manipulation behind it. Hear me out: the essence of this "drama" is the final desperate struggle of traditional financial logic against the crypto market. When the scale surpasses the billion-dollar mark, the truth is often more shocking than conspiracy theories.

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurnerSociety

· 8h ago

We've seen this exchange's manipulation routine many times before: pretending to be blind when bottom-fishing, turning into conspiracy theory experts when pumping the price. It's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0