2025-12-25 04:20:27

The numbers on the screen are bouncing, with annualized returns jumping from 7% to 11%. But behind that dazzling percentage, what kind of game rules are really at play?

Many people have experienced this moment—seeing a DeFi protocol's yield panel, those tempting numbers make your heart race a bit. But when your mouse hovers over the confirm button, there's always a voice asking: "What exactly is going on behind the scenes?"

**The Two Realms of Yield**

7% is the threshold; 11% is the real sweet spot. Let's see how this logic shifts.

Put stablecoin USDf in, convert it to sUSDf, and there are two paths. Choose the "Classic Mode," which can be withdrawn at any time, with yields around 7%; or select the "Enhanced Mode," lock sUSDf for 3 to 6 months, and the yield can reach 11%.

What does this lock-up period really mean? If the market suddenly crashes, and the protocol encounters issues, sorry—your funds are frozen during that time. The risk and reward balance is thus disrupted.

**The Truth Behind the Yield Composition**

Recently, the 7.84% annualized yield in Classic Mode looks decent, but peeling back the layers reveals that 61% of the returns come from options strategies, 21% from staking, and the rest from various arbitrage activities.

Diversification sounds wonderful, but that's precisely where the problem lies—each component is a variable, and combined risks stack up like a Jenga tower. If the foundation is unstable, the whole thing collapses. Options can profit in volatile markets, but in a market with a one-sided decline or continuous rise, they turn into tools for loss.

**Visible Dashboard, Invisible Operations**

The protocol has a dashboard, releases quarterly reports, and even promises audits. But the core issue remains unresolved: do you really understand how your money is being managed?

How much leverage does the trading team use? Where are stop-losses set? These data are either not disclosed or hidden in the corners of reports. Risks grow in these unseen areas.

The returns are tempting, but the premise is that you must accept operational risks that you may not fully understand.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationSurvivor

· 2h ago

It's the same trick again. As soon as the lock-up period is announced, I know I'm about to fall into a trap. --- 61% from options? Isn't that just betting on volatility? The true test is during a crash. --- What is clear is that leverage and stop-loss are all hidden away. I really don't dare to touch this kind of return. --- Steadily earning 7%, a hundred times better than that 11% black box. --- The problem is that once the market moves against you, this stacked approach collapses directly. I've fallen for this trick before.

View OriginalReply0

NullWhisperer

· 2h ago

yeah so 61% from options strats is genuinely alarming, that's not diversification that's just... concentrated directional bet disguised as yield. the "audit promise" thing killed me tho lol, audit findings never get published til something breaks

Reply0

MEVvictim

· 2h ago

As soon as the lock-up period appears, it’s an immediate pass, not like I haven't seen protocols run away before.

View OriginalReply0

TokenToaster

· 2h ago

Locking for three months only yields 11%? Bro, I'm just saying, that's just risk being beautified and sold to you. It's really more reliable to just earn a steady 7%.

View OriginalReply0

BugBountyHunter

· 3h ago

As soon as the lock-up period appears, you know it's not good news. 61% comes from options? This is just gambling on volatility.

View OriginalReply0