Recently, the adjustment in the crypto market has been so sudden that "abrupt" hardly suffices to describe it. Bitcoin has fallen from a high of about $125,000 in early October, dropping over 35%, and even briefly touching $86,000. Many were expecting the Federal Reserve's easing policies to take effect, but instead, a hawkish "turnaround" occurred. The total market cap of cryptocurrencies shrank by approximately $1 trillion within a few months, a figure that represents many investors' accounts turning red.



But is this sharp decline really just a policy shock? Not entirely. Deutsche Bank's latest analysis points to a deeper logic — this adjustment is the result of a collision between macro and micro factors. A comprehensive correction of risk assets, a hawkish shift in the Federal Reserve's policy stance, regulatory stagnation, quiet withdrawals by large institutions, and long-term holders cashing out profits—all these forces have pushed the market down from its peak.

What’s more painful is that the myth of Bitcoin's "hedging" attribute has been shattered. When trade tensions are high and tech stocks face valuation doubts, Bitcoin does not move independently; instead, it plunges along with high-growth tech stocks. The data shows that since the start of 2025, the daily correlation between Bitcoin and the Nasdaq 100 has soared to 46%, and its correlation with the S&P 500 has risen to 42%. What does this mean? Bitcoin's current price movement logic is now more similar to a high-growth tech stock than to the so-called store of value that supposedly transcends market cycles.
BTC1.65%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MevSandwichvip
· 3h ago
Once again, a textbook-level operation of cutting leeks.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizervip
· 10h ago
35% decline, $1 trillion evaporated, the data speaks Relevance 46%? Laughs, this is not a safe-haven asset, just pure tech stock retail investors Five forces combined? Forget it, just two words—inefficient capital allocation
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observervip
· 10h ago
46% correlation... indicates that Bitcoin has long become a risk asset, so how can it still boast safe-haven properties?
View OriginalReply0
MevHuntervip
· 10h ago
Haha, safe-haven attribute? That's hilarious. I should have seen through it long ago.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkepticvip
· 10h ago
It's another feast of pulling the wool over investors' eyes; I see through it.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBarbervip
· 11h ago
125,000 drops to 86,000, my goodness, no one can really dodge this wave. Hedging properties? Ha, we're tired of hearing that story. Right now, BTC is just a high-risk asset. Institutions are fleeing, retail investors are crying, classic two-way cut. What does a 46% correlation mean? It means what we believe in is actually no different from tech stocks. One trillion dollars evaporated, how many accounts turned green? I am one of them, damn. The Federal Reserve turns around, and the whole market has to dance along. How can they still call it decentralization? Five forces work together, this isn't so simple, it's not just policy taking the blame. Long-term holders are selling, this signal is clearer than anything else. They know what it means to take profits when things look good.
View OriginalReply0
DaisyUnicornvip
· 11h ago
The myth of safe-haven attributes has been shattered, and our little Huahua is also plunging along with tech stocks...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)