2025-12-30 15:27:38

Having identified a new listing opportunity on a major wallet platform, I plan to use 3 BNB to participate in the Brevis project. Based on a scenario where 50,000 people participate simultaneously, these 3 BNB could theoretically receive 400 new tokens, with a pre-market value of about $188. It sounds quite promising.

But the more I delve into this calculation, the more I feel that some aspects are suspicious. The official release of 40 million tokens—why is only half of them allocated for the new listing? Where does the other half go? Additionally, from receiving the Key to the official launch, will the conversion ratio be temporarily adjusted? This is the most unsettling point—will my 3 BNB stake unknowingly become chips in the hands of the market makers?

The potential gains from the new listing are attractive, but the risks should also be questioned in advance.

BNB1.02%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FomoAnxiety

· 5h ago

How can 40 million coins only be half-heartedly thrown out for new listings? Isn't this just a typical scheme?

View OriginalReply0

HypotheticalLiquidator

· 8h ago

Investing 3 BNBs, with a theoretical return of 188U, sounds great, but this calculation has never actually worked in reality. I've seen too many of these IPO-style schemes; they are essentially a domino effect—half of the 40 million tokens are released for the IPO, and what about the other half? Are they being used for liquidity mining or directly given to VCs? When the conversion ratio changes on the opening day, your health factor instantly collapses. The official hasn't clearly explained the supply volume and release mechanism, which is the biggest risk warning in itself—more alarming than any data. It has truly become a pawn for the whales. --- I can smell the rhythm of pump and dump; what seems like an opportunity for an IPO is actually the night before a chain of margin calls and liquidations. --- 50,000 participants? Wake up, this data is already highly inflated; the actual distribution will definitely be diluted to an unimaginable extent. --- Before participating in the IPO, ask clearly—token unlock curve, liquidity depth, whether there is a lock-up period. If you can't explain any of these, you should withdraw—don't gamble on these 3 BNBs. --- I just want to know where the other 20 million tokens went; this is the key to whether you can exit alive after the opening.

View OriginalReply0

MrDecoder

· 8h ago

It's the same trick again, only releasing half of the 40 million tokens for the IPO? What about the rest? Probably going to dump the price.

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinArbitrageur

· 9h ago

It's the same old trick again, beautiful numbers hiding all the pitfalls --- 40 million tokens only released half? Is the remaining half all going into insiders' pockets --- Betting 3 BNB for 188U, sounds great but who can guarantee what will happen when it opens --- I have to check this kind of IPO for half a day now, afraid of accidentally giving chips to the manipulators --- Can the conversion ratio be temporarily adjusted at the opening? Brother, this is the real core risk --- Pre-market value of 188U sometimes gets halved directly at opening, I've seen it too many times --- This operation by the official really can't hold up, why not be transparent and explain clearly --- It's okay when there are few people, but when 50,000 people compete, the distribution ratio will definitely change --- Attractive returns ≈ hidden pitfalls, this trick has been played out in the crypto circle --- I want to ask, where does the other 50% of the tokens from the official this time finally go

View OriginalReply0

DefiSecurityGuard

· 9h ago

ngl, the token allocation mechanics here scream classic honeypot setup... 50% of supply unaccounted for? that's literally textbook rugpull indicators. not to sound alarmist, but i'd run the contract through a proper audit before touching this. DYOR and check the smart contract vulnerability vectors first.

Reply0