2026-01-08 03:22:56

Looking at the current market, new projects are emerging one after another, but very few can survive more than two or three days. Some can't even last 2 minutes. Frankly speaking, the problem with these projects lies in one place — they lack actual community support and a genuine consensus foundation.

Flip through these new coin proposals, and it's mostly just various gimmicks: cat and dog themes, bullish and bearish concepts, packaging... It looks lively, but it's all just a passing trend. No ecosystem, no practical use cases, and no long-term value support.

In contrast, HappySci has been stable for four days, driven continuously by a professional team. This is the right path for new projects. Projects with people, consensus, and direction are the ones that can survive longer in this market.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NervousFingers

· 01-08 06:00

Another scam to fool retail investors, huh? Soft ads like HappySci are way too obvious.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainSleuth

· 01-08 03:52

Garbage coins that can't last two minutes should have died long ago. Choosing the wrong track means admitting defeat. That's why I only look at the team and consensus; everything else is虚的. Another four-day project? I'll observe first, no rush to get on board. Community consensus is really the key; without it, all the fancy tricks are useless. Cat coins and dog coins are everywhere; truly viable projects are scarce. Having a professional team operating makes a big difference; other new coins are just for laughs. Honestly, those entering now need to have a gambler's mentality; most are just tricks to harvest the leeks.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-08 03:52

Not even two minutes? Laughing out loud, these projects are just IQ taxes. Really, there are too many scam coins now, just looking at them makes me sick. HappySci in four days? That’s genuine effort, unlike some who blow their horns every day. What the market needs right now is a clear-out, trash projects should get out. Community consensus is indeed a hard indicator; without it, all the hype is pointless. I think CatCoin and Dogecoin are enough, and yet they’re still being packaged as concepts... who are they fooling? Speaking of which, projects with real ecological support are truly rare; most are just schemes to scalp investors.

View OriginalReply0

gaslight_gasfeez

· 01-08 03:50

Can't last more than 2 minutes? Haha, how embarrassing. Four days of stable operation, what's that worth? Most of the trash coins I've seen start like this. It's another cat and dog coin, so boring. The so-called consensus foundation, honestly, isn't it just about whether big investors are willing to buy in? I need to check out HappySci; at least it's more reliable than those shell coins. Community support? All fake, it just depends on whether the team dares to rug. Honestly, I've gotten tired of reading these analysis articles; it's better to just gamble directly. Whether it's a real project or a fake one, ultimately, it's about whether someone is willing to pour money in.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTaxonomist

· 01-08 03:42

ngl, "four days of stability" is literally just... statistical noise? per my analysis, that's taxonomically indistinguishable from the 2-minute rugs you're dunking on. where's the actual on-chain data tho

Reply0

RektButAlive

· 01-08 03:33

Damn, it's the same old spiel... Stable in just four days? Wake up, buddy. Cat and dog coins are indeed trash, but hyping HappySci is just too much. There are no real projects in this market, stop fooling yourself. Community support? Bro, why don't you talk about Ponzi schemes? If there was real consensus, would you need to post daily copy?

View OriginalReply0