2026-01-08 05:21:45

Just recently came across this token project, and from on-chain data, it looks quite interesting. The token economic model is well designed—large wallet holdings account for 40%, and the burn mechanism accounts for 10%. This kind of design creates significant constraints on circulation. More importantly, the current market cap is only around 100,000, so it is still in the early stages.

What’s interesting is that this reflects a trend in the Chinese on-chain ecosystem. As more localized projects emerge, the Chinese sector is building its own discourse system. Although the scale is still small, this kind of localization exploration is worth paying attention to. Given time, the rise of the Chinese ecosystem could bring many new opportunities. Of course, all projects need time to be validated, and a small market cap also means risks and opportunities coexist.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RektRecorder

· 23h ago

With a market cap of just over 100,000, still hyping the rise of the Chinese ecosystem—this logic doesn't quite hold up, haha.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSqueezer

· 23h ago

100,000 market cap? That’s pretty early, feels like it’s not even awake yet Early projects are like this, betting on whether they can survive until the next round The rise of the Chinese ecosystem sounds good, but it depends on who takes the lead This kind of burn mechanism is a bit old-fashioned, new projects all play like this Small market cap = high risk, high reward? Or high risk, high loss haha There are many localized projects, but only a few truly survive Whales hold 40%, be careful, there’s always a risk of a dump Quite interested, but I need to wait before entering, don’t want to be the bag holder Buying early projects now is just gambling on probabilities, I’ll stay on the sidelines for now

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-6bc33122

· 23h ago

Market cap only 100,000? Isn't this just a casino? Haha, but speaking of which, holding 40% by big players is indeed quite aggressive. The Chinese ecosystem is coming up, and that feels like the real opportunity. Those entering now are all gamblers. The 10% burn mechanism sounds good, but it hasn't been implemented. There are many local projects, but only a few can survive; the risk is still high. Wait, the Chinese sector has its own discourse system? How long does this need to be hyped up?

View OriginalReply0