2026-01-08 06:25:19

Recently, I have been observing many market trends and have some thoughts. The US stock market is clearly diverging, Hong Kong stocks lack popularity, while the crypto space is bustling—Ethereum network upgrades, stablecoin ecosystems advancing, and frequent applications for institutional banking licenses.

It seems like everything is happening and changing rapidly. But upon closer reflection, I realize that the core issues have not changed. Assets are indeed moving quickly on the blockchain, but as soon as real implementation, institutional participation, and compliance clearing are involved, a bunch of legacy problems surface. These are not issues that can be directly solved by technological upgrades.

ETH-1.2%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnchainDetective

· 22h ago

Hmm... According to on-chain data, there's definitely something interesting behind this wave of institutional license applications. The trading patterns are unusually frequent, clearly testing the limits of regulation. I had long suspected that no matter how advanced the technology is, it’s useless. Promoting the stablecoin ecosystem? After analysis and assessment, it’s still unavoidable to cross the compliance hurdle. The problem hasn't changed; it's just a different way of repeating the same pattern.

View OriginalReply0

FUD_Whisperer

· 22h ago

That's right, what's the point of fast on-chain circulation? In the end, it's still stuck on compliance. Institutions come in just for the hype; where's the real money? --- Daily upgrades, new tokens every day—at the end of the day, it's still the same old problem. No matter how advanced the technology is, it can't change the pace of regulation. --- That's why I keep saying, the real bottleneck isn't in the code, but in the legal department's office. --- No one is interested in Hong Kong stocks, US stocks are diverging, and everyone is watching ETH's rise and fall. Isn't that ironic? --- What’s the point of pushing stablecoins? Clearing processes get stuck, and all previous optimizations are pointless. Haven't you understood after all these years? --- Are there many institutional bank license applications? That's just for show to regulators. The real implementation is still a long way off. --- The core issue hasn't changed, and that hits the nail on the head. Every day new terms and concepts emerge, but the institutional barriers are still there. --- Ethereum upgrades and ecosystem development—just listen and don't take it too seriously. The real challenge is compliance.

View OriginalReply0

DevChive

· 22h ago

Oh, well said. Keep pushing the technical ceiling upward, but the underlying issues are still the same... The compliance hurdle has really stifled many projects. It's truly something that blockchain can't solve; it requires policy approval. Upgrade, upgrade, upgrade—ultimately, it depends on how regulators play their cards. Honestly, it's just two words—wait, wait for the breakthrough moment. Stablecoins are booming, but the clearing process still faces the same old problems. Institutions are here, but they don't dare to act recklessly; they say they're entering, but it's still a wait-and-see period. This is the core issue. It's not about how fast your chain runs, but whether the rules can keep up.

View OriginalReply0