Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Hequ County People's Court successfully resolved a private lending dispute
This article is reprinted from: Xinzhou Daily
This report informs that private lending concerns the “wallets” of the public and family stability. People’s courts protect legal lending according to the law and crack down on usury, predatory lending, and illegal lending behaviors, which translates judicial actions into tangible benefits for the people. Recently, the People’s Court of Hequ County successfully mediated a private lending dispute, effectively maintaining financial order and social stability.
The case originated in April 2011, when Zhang and Li borrowed over 180,000 yuan from Wang to open an aluminum alloy door shop for daily operations, with a verbal agreement of an interest rate of 1.5% per month (annualized 18%). However, due to poor management, the shop went bankrupt, and Wang repeatedly demanded repayment without success. Just after the New Year in 2026, Wang jointly sued Zhang and Li at the People’s Court of Hequ County, demanding repayment of the principal and interest totaling over 660,000 yuan.
After taking over the case, the presiding judge conducted an in-depth understanding of the business operations and personal financial situations of Zhang and Li. Given that the case was a simple private lending dispute and the defendants did have actual difficulties, the presiding judge decided to prioritize mediation.
During the mediation, the presiding judge, on one hand, explained the law to Wang, clarifying that high interest is unacceptable and interpreting relevant legal provisions on interest rates and upfront fees, guiding him to protect his rights rationally; on the other hand, he explained the real difficulties faced by the two defendants. Wang gradually recognized the risks and irrationality of high-interest loans and agreed to negotiate.
Defendant Zhang raised no objections, while Li, for personal reasons, requested an extension on the repayment time. The mediation ultimately reached an agreement: confirming the principal of over 180,000 yuan, with a total repayment of principal and interest amounting to over 190,000 yuan. Among them, Zhang is to repay 100,000 yuan within a month; Li will repay the remaining 90,000 yuan over three years. After the mediation, both parties expressed satisfaction with the outcome. (Wu Yalong)