Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Judge Halts Trump's White House Ballroom Project
(MENAFN- Khaama Press) ** A federal judge has ordered a temporary halt to Donald Trump’s proposed White House ballroom, ruling that the project cannot proceed without congressional approval.**
US District Judge Richard Leon blocked further construction on the planned $400 million ballroom, which was to rise on the site of the demolished East Wing of the White House. In his ruling, Leon said the president is the“steward” of the White House, not its owner, and cannot unilaterally authorize a major structural transformation of the historic complex.
The case was brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which argued that the demolition and new construction violated legal procedures and bypassed the constitutional role of Congress. The court granted a preliminary injunction, meaning the project will remain paused while the legal challenge moves forward.
Trump has defended the ballroom plan by arguing that it would be funded through private donations rather than taxpayer money. But the judge said private financing does not override the need for congressional authorization when altering one of the most symbolically and historically important public buildings in the United States.
The ruling does not necessarily end the project, but it creates a significant legal and political obstacle for the administration. The Justice Department has already moved to preserve its right to appeal, suggesting the case could continue through higher courts if the White House decides to press ahead.
The dispute has also reignited broader debate over presidential power, historical preservation and the limits of executive authority over federally protected landmarks. Critics say the plan reflects an effort to reshape a national institution through personal taste and private influence, while supporters argue the president should have more discretion over functional updates to the residence.
The proposed ballroom has been one of Trump’s most high-profile architectural ambitions for the White House, envisioned as a large ceremonial and event space that would dramatically expand the complex’s hosting capacity. Preservation groups, however, have warned that such a project risks permanently altering the character and historic integrity of the executive mansion.
The White House has long been treated not only as a residence and workplace, but also as a protected national symbol subject to strict oversight. Significant structural changes have historically required layers of review involving Congress, preservation authorities and federal planning bodies, particularly when historic sections are affected.
MENAFN01042026000228011069ID1110929120