I noticed that a pretty interesting discussion has erupted around the market structure bill. The crypto community is literally divided — some see it as a compromise that could help the industry, while others see it as a betrayal of principles. Honestly, such a compromise was inevitable once regulators started to intervene more actively.

What amazes me is the range of opinions. People who were once allies now view this compromise completely differently. Some say it’s a necessary step toward legitimizing and institutionalizing the sector, while others see it as a threat to decentralization.

When I read community discussions, it becomes clear that the compromise has touched on the most sensitive issues. Questions about transparency, independence, and market integrity — all of this is now in the spotlight. And that’s right, because how we deal with this compromise will determine the future of the entire industry.

It seems to me that the crypto community needs to get used to the fact that perfect solutions don’t exist. Every compromise gives something but also takes something away. The main thing is to understand exactly what we are losing and what we are gaining. And for that, honest discussion is needed, not just mutual accusations.