NY Stock Exchange officially announces on-chain securities! 24-hour stablecoin trading settlement revolutionizes Wall Street

MarketWhisper
USDC0,01%
PYUSD0,05%
DAI0,03%

紐交所官宣做鏈上證券

New York Stock Exchange develops a tokenized securities platform, enabling stocks to be traded as on-chain tokens. 24×7 around-the-clock trading, with real-time settlement via stablecoins, shortening the T+1/T+2 cycle. Tokenized securities are fully equivalent to traditional stocks, with complete shareholder rights. This is a “security-native + blockchain” design, rebuilding the settlement system with blockchain technology.

Core Mechanism of NYSE Tokenized Securities Platform

The NYSE is developing a tokenized securities platform aimed at allowing compliant securities like stocks to be traded and settled as “on-chain tokens.” Trades are still denominated in USD but can occur 24×7, no longer limited to US stock trading hours; after execution, near-instant settlement can be achieved via stablecoins or tokenized deposits, significantly reducing the traditional T+1/T+2 clearing cycle.

This design’s revolutionary aspect is retaining the core rules of the securities market while introducing blockchain’s technological advantages. Investors purchase regulated securities with full shareholder rights, including dividends and voting, but the trading and settlement processes are blockchain-based. This “gradual innovation” is more likely to gain regulatory approval and market acceptance compared to radical crypto-native projects that aim to completely overthrow traditional finance.

24×7 around-the-clock trading is a major breakthrough. Traditional stock markets only open during specific hours on weekdays, stopping entirely on weekends and holidays. This limitation is outdated in a globalized era where news and events happen 24/7, yet investors can only react during limited hours. NYSE’s tokenized platform allows investors to trade anytime, which is especially beneficial for investors in Asia and Europe who no longer need to stay up late to trade US stocks.

Near-instant settlement is another key advantage. Traditional securities transactions require T+1 or T+2 days to clear and settle, during which funds and securities are frozen. Blockchain’s real-time settlement capability can shorten this cycle to minutes, greatly improving capital efficiency. For high-frequency traders and institutional investors, this efficiency boost has significant commercial value.

Features of NYSE Tokenized Securities Platform

24×7 Trading: Operates around the clock, not limited by US stock hours

Near-instant Settlement: Settles via stablecoins, reducing from T+1/T+2 to minutes

Full Shareholder Rights: Tokenized securities enjoy dividends, voting, and other rights

Regulatory Broker Access: Integrates within existing regulatory frameworks without rebuilding the system

Parity Guarantee: Tokenized securities are fully equivalent and interchangeable with traditional securities

The key point is that these tokenized securities are fully equivalent to existing stocks; investors still enjoy full shareholder rights like dividends and voting, participating through compliant brokers. This is a “security-native + blockchain” design, not simply overlaying crypto concepts onto stocks. Essentially, NYSE is using blockchain to rebuild the settlement and capital flow infrastructure of the securities market, laying the groundwork for a future global, 24/7-capable capital market.

Traditional Finance Absorbing Blockchain, Not Replacing It

It’s interesting that NYSE announced this “on-chain securities” initiative now. Many crypto practitioners have long misunderstood: believing “on-chain finance will completely replace traditional finance,” like a new species wiping out the old system. But the actual path may be quite the opposite. Traditional finance, on one hand, restricts crypto projects from invading its territory through compliance issues; on the other hand, it actively adopts blockchain as a foundational technology upgrade rather than ceding ground to crypto-native systems.

Historically, the internet followed a similar trajectory. Internet companies found it difficult to directly enter core financial systems—clearing, settlement, custody, licensing, and credit creation have always remained in the hands of financial institutions. The eventual outcome was not “Internet finance replacing banks,” but banks integrating internet technology into their core systems: online banking, electronic payments, risk control systems became fully internetized, yet the financial power structure remained unchanged.

Blockchain may be following the same path. NYSE’s move signals this: blockchain is no longer just a “playground” for crypto assets but is beginning to enter securities-grade financial infrastructure. Subsequently, stablecoins will be widely used for settlement of stocks and other securities, elevating their role from “transaction medium” to part of the clearing system.

This development path is a warning for crypto-native projects. Those attempting to radically overthrow traditional finance may find themselves marginalized in the end. Conversely, projects willing to cooperate with traditional finance and comply with regulations may find opportunities for survival and growth in this integration process. NYSE’s platform is likely to use regulation-compliant stablecoins (such as USDC, PYUSD) as settlement tools, which is a major boon for these compliant stablecoins.

From a power structure perspective, NYSE’s tokenized securities platform remains controlled and operated by NYSE. Blockchain is merely a technological infrastructure, not a decentralized governance mechanism. Investors still need to participate through regulated brokers, with KYC and AML requirements fully in place. This is completely opposite to the emphasis on “decentralization” and “permissionless” in crypto-native projects.

Stablecoins Upgrading from Transaction Medium to Settlement Tool

NYSE’s tokenized securities platform elevates the role of stablecoins from “transaction medium” to “part of the settlement system.” In current crypto markets, stablecoins are mainly used for exchanging between different crypto assets or as hedging tools. But on NYSE’s platform, stablecoins will be used for settling compliant securities transactions—a qualitative leap.

When stablecoins start settling stock trades, their status will be greatly enhanced. Traditional securities settlement involves complex clearinghouse systems, multiple confirmations, and reconciliations, which cause the T+1/T+2 cycle. Blockchain’s distributed ledger technology allows all participants to see the same transaction record instantly, eliminating tedious reconciliation. Coupled with stablecoins’ real-time transfer capabilities, settlement can be completed within minutes after trade execution.

This efficiency boost has profound implications for the entire financial system. Shortening the settlement cycle reduces counterparty risk, decreases capital lock-up, and improves capital turnover. For securities markets processing trillions of dollars daily, even a one-day reduction in settlement time can free up hundreds of billions in liquidity.

From the perspective of stablecoin issuers, this is a huge market opportunity. If NYSE’s platform succeeds, other exchanges and financial institutions may follow suit. The global securities market is worth hundreds of trillions USD; if even a small portion moves to on-chain settlement, it will create enormous demand for stablecoins. Issuers like Circle (USDC), PayPal (PYUSD) stand to benefit significantly.

However, this also means the stablecoin market will be further controlled by traditional financial institutions. Decentralized or censorship-resistant stablecoins (like DAI) may not pass NYSE’s regulatory scrutiny. The ultimate outcome could be that traditional financial institutions dominate on-chain financial infrastructure, with blockchain technology adopted but the original ideals of decentralization sacrificed.

Blockchain Repeating the History of Internet Finance Being Absorbed

Many crypto practitioners have long misunderstood: believing “on-chain finance will entirely replace traditional finance,” like a new species wiping out the old system. But the real path may be quite the opposite. Traditional finance, on one hand, uses compliance issues to restrict crypto projects from invading its territory; on the other hand, it actively adopts blockchain as a foundational upgrade, not ceding ground.

Historically, the internet followed a similar pattern. Internet companies found it difficult to directly access core financial systems—clearing, settlement, custody, licensing, and credit creation have always been controlled by financial institutions. The final result was not “Internet finance replacing banks,” but banks integrating internet technology into their core systems: online banking, electronic payments, risk management systems became fully internetized, yet the financial power structure remained unchanged.

Blockchain may be reenacting this same path. NYSE’s move signals this: blockchain is no longer just a “playground” for crypto assets but is entering securities-grade financial infrastructure. This development presents both opportunities and threats for crypto-native projects. Opportunities include mainstream recognition of blockchain tech and a significant market expansion; threats involve traditional financial institutions potentially dominating this process, marginalizing crypto-native projects.

In the long term, this could lead to a dual-market scenario: regulated on-chain finance dominated by traditional institutions serving institutional investors and high-net-worth clients; decentralized crypto-native finance continuing to serve users valuing privacy, censorship resistance, and decentralization. Both coexist but serve different needs.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Circle Mints Over $10B USDC on Solana in One Month

Circle has significantly increased USD Coin (USDC) minting on Solana, totaling over $10.25 billion recently. This surge indicates strong demand linked to crypto trading and DeFi growth, positioning Solana as a key player for stablecoin activity.

Coinfomania17m ago

Circle Destroys 250M USDC on Solana, Monthly Total Reaches 10.25B

Gate News message, Circle destroyed another 250 million USDC four hours ago. Over the past month, Circle has destroyed a total of 10.25 billion USDC on Solana. According to Lookonchain's earlier report on April 3, 2026, Circle has been destroying 750 million USDC per day over the past four days, tot

GateNews7h ago

Circle under fire after $285 million Drift hack over inaction to freeze stolen USDC

After the $285 million Drift hack, the focus is shifting to Circle (CRCL) and whether it could have done more to stop the money. The attacker siphoned off roughly $71 million in USDC as part of the exploit Wednesday, according to blockchain security firm PeckShield. After converting most of the

CoinDesk12h ago

Circle Hit With Allegations of Turning a Blind Eye to $420 Million in Illicit Funds Moving! ZachXBT Exposes a USDC Compliance Gap Igniting Controversy

The U.S. stablecoin company Circle has been accused of failing to effectively freeze more than $420 million in suspicious USDC funds. Investigators ZachXBT pointed out that since 2022, Circle has delayed freeze actions in multiple hack incidents, sparking questions about its compliance. The Drift Protocol attack involved in the incident has also made Circle’s criticism the focus. Market calls for Circle to raise its risk management standards were followed by serious losses to users caused by its delayed compliance enforcement.

ChainNewsAbmedia15h ago

Before Polymarket, Taiwan already had prediction markets: National Chengchi University’s “Future Event Exchange” existed 20 years ago

The “Futures Events Exchange,” launched in Taiwan as early as 2006, combines academic research with market mechanisms and has become an important prediction market in the Chinese-speaking world. The platform trades using virtual currency to predict the likelihood of future events based on prices; some predictions performed better than polls, but later it shut down after a transition. Compared with Polymarket today, the Futures Events Exchange is more like an academic experiment.

ChainNewsAbmedia15h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments