Open-source project Tldraw announces suspension of accepting external contributions due to overwhelming AI-generated junk code. Such “AI Slop” severely drains maintainers’ energy, and the community is exploring the establishment of reputation systems or escrow mechanisms to address this issue.
Overwhelmed by AI-generated content, open-source project Tldraw suspends external PRs
A popular open-source web drawing project on GitHub with over 40,000 stars, Tldraw, recently announced that it will suspend accepting pull requests (PRs) from external contributors.
Developer steveruizok pointed out that, like many open-source projects on GitHub, the team has recently observed a significant increase in contributions generated entirely by AI tools. Although some submissions are correct in form, most lack complete context, misunderstand the codebase, and the submitters rarely participate in discussions afterward.
steveruizok emphasized that an open PR represents a commitment from maintainers, meaning the contribution will be carefully reviewed and seriously considered for inclusion. To keep this promise meaningful, the team must implement stricter filtering.
Currently, Tldraw’s policy is to close all external PRs first, only reopening those that are genuinely considered. This is in the best interest of the project and code quality. Although it’s regrettable to close public contributions, steveruizok stated that they will only consider reopening once GitHub introduces better management tools.
Curl and OCaml also affected, AI Slop rampant
The decision to suspend pull requests at Tldraw is just one recent example of AI Slop (AI garbage) impacting the open-source community. Similar discussions have been heating up on Reddit and Hacker News forums.
A Reddit discussion pointed out that, Daniel Stenberg, maintainer of the well-known transfer tool Curl, revealed that the project is suffering from AI-generated erroneous reports being used in a “DDoS attack.” Approximately 20% of submissions in 2025 are AI garbage content, severely consuming volunteer maintainers’ time.
Additionally, OCaml maintainers have rejected a 13,000-line pull request generated by AI, citing that reviewing AI-produced code is more laborious than manually written code, and a flood of low-quality PRs could lead to system crashes.
Discussions on Hacker News focus on issues with GitHub’s mechanisms.
Some users believe that making PR counts prominent on the page encourages a culture of submitting for the sake of data.
The current dilemma with generative AI in open-source communities stems from many inexperienced developers using AI tools to generate worthless code, expecting maintainers to merge quickly. This behavior is damaging the collaborative trust within open-source communities.
Possible solutions: whitelist or reputation systems
In response to the harassment of garbage code (Shitcode) in open-source communities, Bitcoin developer Bryan Bishop (kanzure) responded on Tldraw’s GitHub page that he had proposed to the Bitcoin Core development team to “privatize” the development process, shifting to a model limited to invited members or requiring whitelist inclusion to post comments and PRs.
Although this might violate the spirit of Bitcoin’s openness, Bryan Bishop believes that it can effectively reduce noise and useless debates caused by non-contributors, allowing developers to focus on the technical aspects and prevent valuable attention from being diverted by malicious or invalid interactions.
Besides privatization, software engineer Steve Rodrigue also suggests establishing cross-project contributor reputation systems, verifying account value through trust networks.
Another developer is working on a blockchain-based “Stake-to-PR” protocol, requiring submitters to pay a small deposit, which is forfeited if the content is deemed AI garbage, and fully refunded if it is a valid contribution. The goal is to raise the barrier to curb AI abuse.
Further reading:
AI content flood! Web3 Dictionary names “Slop” as the 2025 Word of the Year, sparking heated discussions in the tech community
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
# Are Influencer Trading Experts Fake? US-Based TJR Exposed for Course Income Reaching $2 Million
US trading influencer ImanTrading has accused fellow trading influencer TJR of performance fabrication, over-enrolling in courses, and profiting from promoting and then dumping cryptocurrencies, which has garnered widespread attention. The video points out that TJR's trading records appear to be manually entered rather than from actual accounts, and accuses him of creating illusions through exaggerated wealth narratives and simulated account displays. These issues are similar to long-standing phenomena in Taiwan's crypto community, reminding investors to carefully assess the true capabilities of trading influencers.
MarketWhisper2h ago
US Million-Dollar Trading Influencer Exposed for Profiting from Selling Courses! Taiwan's Crypto Circle Also Has Chaos: Demo Accounts Showing Off Trades
US trading influencer TJR is accused of exaggerating performance and profiting through courses, with reports suggesting his course revenue could reach $2 million. Videos expose that he previously borrowed money from friends to trade and failed, and his trading performance data has questionable sources. This incident has raised questions about the trading influencer model, particularly regarding its impact on teenage audiences.
CryptoCity2h ago
Estranged Wife Uses Surveillance Camera to Secretly Record Seed Phrase, Steals 2323 Bitcoin; Husband Files Lawsuit in Anger
A British man has accused his wife of stealing 172 million dollars in Bitcoin through surveillance cameras. The court ruled that traditional "conversion tort" does not apply to digital assets, but the case may proceed through other legal avenues, highlighting digital asset security issues. The judge believes digital assets remain subject to traditional legal constraints, and the case could become an important legal precedent for the future.
動區BlockTempo3h ago
Spain's Basque Autonomous Community Investigates 541 Cryptocurrency Crime Cases in 2025, Police Establish Specialized Department to Combat
Police in Spain's Basque Country revealed that cryptocurrency-related crime cases are continuously rising, with 541 cases investigated in 2025. Authorities have established a specialized department to combat crypto fraud and hacking attacks, and monitor blockchain transactions. Meanwhile, they warned that scammers lure victims through social media to steal their cryptocurrency assets and bank accounts.
GateNews3h ago
UK Man's "Cold Wallet" Seed Phrase Stolen, Wife Allegedly Transfers 2323 Bitcoin
The UK High Court has allowed a lawsuit involving 2,323 bitcoins to proceed to trial. Yuan Pinghui alleges that his wife Li Fenrong secretly recorded his cold wallet seed phrase and illegally transferred bitcoins. The court ruled that "conversion" does not apply to digital assets, but Yuan may still pursue recovery through other legal avenues. This case highlights the limitations and development potential of UK digital asset law.
MarketWhisper4h ago
