"100% win rate with low drawdown" trader pyramid partial execution of long positions, planning to close the position after BTC rises to $84,000.

GateNews
BTC-2,09%

BlockBeats News, February 9 — According to Coinbob’s popular address monitoring, the trader with a “100% win rate low retracement” strategy, which tends to be a sideways market, is currently holding a 20x leveraged BTC long position with an average entry price of $81,400, with an unrealized loss of 326%. Among the 100 pyramid-style buy orders placed today, 70 have been filled, and 30 remain unfilled. The current buy zone is between $68,000 and $69,340. Previously, this address had placed about 100 sell orders in the $84,000 to $86,880 range, planning to close 70.2% of the long positions within that range.

Since January this year, this address has achieved a total profit of $260,000 with an initial capital of approximately $50,000, maintaining a monthly win rate and overall win rate above 85%. Its trading style is a pyramid hedging grid strategy: layering buy and sell orders within a preset price range, building positions and taking profits in a pyramid structure, profiting from repeated oscillation price differences rather than relying on directional bets.

A well-known trader using a similar strategy, “Paul Wei,” has chosen a more conservative approach, using only 2x leverage to pursue stable returns. The two have previously reached a consensus in the shorting zone.

Currently, “Paul Wei” holds a BTC long position with an unrealized loss of about 16%, with an average entry price of $75,400. Yesterday, he placed sell orders in the $72,700 to $77,000 range, planning to close the position within that range.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

From Bitcoin Miners to Payment Layers: Why Infrastructure Conversations Are Turning to Bitcoin Everlight

It’s no secret that bitcoin’s infrastructure has historically been centered around miners, full nodes, and base-layer settlement. This model has managed to prove itself as very durable. At the same time, though, when it comes to transactional throughput, there are some clear constraints. As the

CryptoPotato13m ago

Rocky US economy, private credit stress, war, impact Bitcoin’s odds for $75K rally

Key takeaways: Private credit risks and weak US jobs market data drive Bitcoin lower, but is there a silver lining? Institutional Bitcoin ETF outflows and miner sales test BTC's strength, but the Federal Reserve's options for addressing the federal deficit may also favor scarce

Cointelegraph16m ago

Trump's $1.5T Defense Budget Push, Iran Warning Send Stocks, Gold, and Bitcoin Lower

Wall Street closed mostly lower on Thursday, as President Donald Trump’s national address vowing to hit Iran “extremely hard” reversed Wednesday’s brief optimism and pushed oil prices sharply higher. Oil Hits $111 a Barrel as Trump Speech Crushes April 1 De-escalation Rally Trump delivered the

Coinpedia27m ago

Elevate Your BTC by Integrating Bitcoin Everlight Shards Early

For many years, earning Bitcoin has historically required complicated trading or expensive mining equipment that’s difficult for many people to run at home. This, in the context of users constantly looking for reliable passive income sources in the digital asset space, is important, especially as

CryptoPotato55m ago
Comment
0/400
EverythingWillBeGoodIn2024vip
· 02-12 05:50
2026 Go Go Go 👊
View OriginalReply0