Surface articles and actual actions are often opposite. While Citibank still claims to be optimistic, just look at those quietly lowered target prices to see what’s really behind it.
Let the data speak. Circle’s stock price has now fallen to $83.6, but the target price still stands at $243, nearly $200 apart. This isn’t a matter of faith, but a way for institutions to leave themselves an escape route. Similar situations also appear in other crypto-related stocks: Bullish’s target price was lowered by 13%, MicroStrategy more drastically cut its target price by 33%. The rating remains "Buy," but the numbers are already lying.
Where is the problem? Citibank specifically emphasized "increased token volatility" in its report. It sounds like a neutral statement, but it’s actually a warning about risks. This kind of wording usually indicates that a larger correction may be on the way.
Many people don’t realize a fact: institutional reports are not helping you get ahead. When "positive outlook" and "price cuts" appear together, they are actually hedging risks. Those who chase after good news often become part of the hedging chain.
How to respond? In the short term, don’t chase stocks mentioned by institutions, because the good news has already been priced in. Also, keep an eye on the actual reserve risks of stablecoins like USDC—these details are often overlooked. The most practical advice is to maintain enough cash positions and wait for the market to truly price in institutional expectations.
In plain terms, the real signals are not in the phrase "we remain optimistic," but in the few percentage points of target price reductions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZeroRushCaptain
· 14h ago
Coming back with the same routine? Citibank outwardly expresses optimism, but in practice, they cut prices. Isn't this the classic "I love you but cut you first"? A $200 price difference—how many retail investors can be squeezed into this gap... I’ve been saying, once the target price drops, you should sell. Don't care about any buy rating; that stuff is just a cover for your downside.
View OriginalReply0
ChainDetective
· 14h ago
It's the same old trick again. I remain optimistic, but the target prices keep getting cut more and more aggressively. I've seen Citi's tactics too many times—good news in one hand, price cuts in the other—retail investors just become the tools to fill the gaps.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanAccount
· 14h ago
Citibank's tricks have long been tired, talking up the good and cutting prices on the other hand, a typical case of left hand and right hand working together. Circle has cut from 243 to this level, it feels like they're laying landmines for retail investors.
Surface articles and actual actions are often opposite. While Citibank still claims to be optimistic, just look at those quietly lowered target prices to see what’s really behind it.
Let the data speak. Circle’s stock price has now fallen to $83.6, but the target price still stands at $243, nearly $200 apart. This isn’t a matter of faith, but a way for institutions to leave themselves an escape route. Similar situations also appear in other crypto-related stocks: Bullish’s target price was lowered by 13%, MicroStrategy more drastically cut its target price by 33%. The rating remains "Buy," but the numbers are already lying.
Where is the problem? Citibank specifically emphasized "increased token volatility" in its report. It sounds like a neutral statement, but it’s actually a warning about risks. This kind of wording usually indicates that a larger correction may be on the way.
Many people don’t realize a fact: institutional reports are not helping you get ahead. When "positive outlook" and "price cuts" appear together, they are actually hedging risks. Those who chase after good news often become part of the hedging chain.
How to respond? In the short term, don’t chase stocks mentioned by institutions, because the good news has already been priced in. Also, keep an eye on the actual reserve risks of stablecoins like USDC—these details are often overlooked. The most practical advice is to maintain enough cash positions and wait for the market to truly price in institutional expectations.
In plain terms, the real signals are not in the phrase "we remain optimistic," but in the few percentage points of target price reductions.