I was recently amused by a large model seriously talking nonsense. When I asked it a question, it started to "hallucinate." It felt like being in "Don Quixote," unable to tell windmills from giants, even begging it not to deceive me.

Today's AI is all a black box. You feed it code, it gives you results. Was it poisoned during input or secretly swapped? It all depends on "blind trust." This situation is simply a poor imitation of reality.

Warden Protocol @wardenprotocol is essentially doing "truth dehydration" for AI projects. They believe AI shouldn't be an airy castle but should be hard currency. Previously, we could only listen to manufacturers boast, but now Warden brings it onto L1, with all requests and responses directly embedded on the chain, tamper-proof.

It's like hiring a bodyguard—you don't have to worry about him being swapped midway because Warden uses cryptography to prove this "truth symbol" as a guarantee: the model you selected is the one that's running.

Getting to the point, this project is expected to have its TGE in January 2026. The long cycle indicates they are holding back a big move. I personally think if AI Agents can truly start automating trades and running strategies on-chain, the $250M to $400M FDV isn't really expensive. After all, this is a literary process of moving from "trust" to "verification." In a bull market, pushing a $700M isn't impossible.

Stop being fooled by those centralized black boxes that only draw pie charts. The current way of understanding should be: no more ads, just check the hash on-chain.

This wave of Warden has exposed the "black box illusion" of AI.