Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Macro strategists warn: Once market sentiment "breaks defenses," a US recession could hit suddenly, and the rate cut room opens up instantly!
The U.S. economy is becoming increasingly fragile amid energy shocks. If market sentiment cracks, the risk of recession will suddenly rise, and expectations for Fed rate cuts will be quickly repriced.
On March 26, Bloomberg macro strategist Simon White wrote that although the probability of a recession in the U.S. remains relatively low, hard data pressures are rising, and the potential escalation of Middle East tensions provides a catalyst for soft data deterioration. He warns that once a recession arrives, it tends to be fierce and unforgiving to unhedged portfolios.
In terms of market impact, almost no assets are currently priced for a recession scenario. Once recession risk heats up, short-term U.S. interest rates will face the most dramatic re-pricing—market expectations for rate cuts earlier this year have already been reduced by about 60 basis points due to the conflict, but if recession signals become clear, these expectations will not only return quickly but may even surpass pre-conflict levels.
Recession Risks Are Building
Simon White’s recession warning model consists of 14 sub-models, which trigger a recession signal only when at least 40% are activated. Currently, only about 20% of the sub-models are triggered, including a recently activated oil price surge indicator, indicating that recent recession risk remains manageable.
However, historical patterns of the model show that once readings break above the 20%-30% range, they tend to rise rapidly, reflecting the abrupt nature of recessions in the real economy. After increasing the weight of the oil price sub-model to reflect its growing impact on GDP, the model’s reading has risen from just above 20% to 30%, approaching the 40% critical threshold. Just two more sub-models triggering could send a recession warning.
The implied recession probability in equity and credit markets is about 20%, while copper prices and the yield curve are more pessimistic, with implied probabilities of 45%-55%. The S&P 500 has only fallen about 4% since the outbreak of war, and the S&P Global Composite PMI preliminary reading has slightly declined to 51.4. Market sentiment remains resilient overall—but whether this calm can persist will be key to whether the U.S. can avoid a recession.
Hard Data Is Under Pressure, Policy Space Is Limited
The danger now is that hard data has already shown signs of strain. Year-to-date, housing data, auto sales, and overall coincident indicators have all weakened.
Simon White points out that this is a “worst-case combination.” When soft data weakens first, the Fed still has a chance to intervene early with easing to break negative feedback loops and stabilize sentiment before hard data deteriorates. But when hard data leads the decline, damage is often already done, and policy interventions are less effective.
Currently, soft data has not shown clear deterioration; indicators like ISM, margin accounts, money supply growth, and the yield curve remain relatively stable. But once soft data begins to weaken and resonates with hard data, both surpassing warning levels simultaneously, the probability of falling into a recession within the next 2 to 3 months will rise sharply.
Energy Shocks Amplify Downside Risks
Oil prices are the central variable in the current risk landscape. Gerard Minack of Minack Advisors notes that although U.S. energy efficiency has improved significantly—now supporting more than three times the real GDP per barrel of oil compared to the 1970s—this progress also means that if high oil prices cause demand destruction, the negative impact of losing a barrel of oil on GDP could be tripled.
Simon White compares the current situation to the 1990 recession. Back then, a banking crisis had already tightened credit, Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait doubled oil prices, and the energy shock prolonged and deepened that recession, with stocks falling 20%. Today, widening credit spreads and pressures on private credit already show early signs of credit deterioration, echoing the unsettling background of 1990.
Market Impact Under Recession
If a U.S. recession materializes, all asset classes will face significant re-pricing. Since 1960, the median stock market decline during recessions has been 12%, but after the OPEC oil shock of 1973-1974, declines reached as high as 45%.
While bonds may benefit from safe-haven flows, given the stagflation nature of this shock, bond gains may fall short of the performance seen during past three decades of recessions. Commodities tend to perform relatively well during commodity-price-driven recessions.
The area most likely to see the largest re-pricing is the U.S. short-term interest rate market. Simon White states that the timing for this trade has not yet arrived, but once market sentiment begins to break and recession risk rises, the re-pricing of rate cut expectations will come “without mercy and swiftly,” potentially exceeding pre-conflict levels.
Risk Warning and Disclaimer
Market risks exist; invest cautiously. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and does not consider individual user’s specific investment goals, financial situation, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, views, or conclusions herein are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investment involves risk, and responsibility rests with the individual investor.