The U.S. Congress promotes the "Promoting Blockchain Development and Innovation Act," proposing to amend Section 1960 to establish a "safe harbor" for open-source developers.

On February 28, U.S. lawmakers from both parties jointly introduced the “Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act” on February 26, aiming to clarify the legal responsibilities of blockchain developers and prevent open-source code authors from being mistakenly classified as remittance institutions. The proposal, led by Scott Fitzgerald, Ben Cline, and Zoe Lofgren, focuses on amending Section 1960 of the U.S. Code to target custodians who control customer assets or execute transfers on behalf of users.

The bill suggests that, amid rising debates over whether “open-source software developers should bear remittance licensing responsibilities” and “legal risks for non-custodial blockchain developers,” clear exemptions should be provided for entities that only write or distribute code. The ongoing lawsuits related to Tornado Cash have further amplified industry concerns about “code as crime.” Ben Cline noted that long-term regulatory expansion blurs the line between malicious actors and technological innovators; Scott Fitzgerald also emphasized that innovators should not face undue law enforcement pressure for developing infrastructure.

Industry support has come from the Solana Institute and the Blockchain Association, which believe the bill will help establish a clear framework distinguishing “open-source developers from custodial financial intermediaries.” Meanwhile, discussions in Washington also include topics like the CLARITY Act and the GENIUS Act. The former, passed by the House in 2025 but with slowed progress, aims to clarify regulations, while the latter enhances stablecoin oversight without expanding developer responsibilities.

Analysts believe that if enacted, the “Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act” will set a precedent for reshaping the U.S. crypto regulatory framework and defining blockchain developers’ compliance boundaries. Ongoing lobbying efforts continue, and the specific wording and scope of the Section 1960 amendments could be a key factor influencing U.S. crypto policy in 2026.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Australian Gen Z 23% Hold Cryptocurrency, ASIC Warns of AI Financial Advisory Risks

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission investigation shows that 23% of Gen Z hold cryptocurrency, and 64% trust AI platforms as sources of financial information. Despite their widespread reliance on social media for financial knowledge, they may face unrealistic investment expectations and fraud risks. ASIC is strengthening regulation of these emerging financial channels.

MarketWhisper7m ago

Australian Senate Committee Recommends Country Advance Crypto Framework Legislation

The Australian Senate Economics Legislation Committee supports bringing cryptocurrency platforms within the financial services regime, amending relevant legislation to establish a licensing and compliance framework, requiring service providers to hold financial services licenses, and providing a six-month transition period.

GateNews1h ago

Bipartisan Blockade! U.S. Congress Passes Bill to Ban Federal Reserve from Issuing CBDC Before 2031

The U.S. Senate passed a housing bill 89-10 that bans the issuance of central bank digital currencies (CBDC) before 2031 and promotes the development of private stablecoin markets. The bill has sparked disagreement between the two chambers over the duration of the ban, with the House of Representatives hoping for a permanent prohibition. Despite strong support, there remains uncertainty and political variables in subsequent negotiations in the House.

CryptoCity1h ago

Ledger Executive: If the US Bans Stablecoin Yields, Other Countries May Fill the Regulatory Gap

Ledger Asia-Pacific Head Shibayama stated that if the US implements a stablecoin yield ban, international discussions will increase. Countries like Australia have already provided regulatory exemptions, and currently most stablecoins do not offer yields to users. US regulatory bill progress has been slow due to opposition to prohibition clauses supported by the banking industry. Asian financial institutions' focus has shifted toward financial product tokenization and stablecoin issuance, rather than crypto-native products like DeFi.

GateNews1h ago

Will stablecoin yields be banned by the US? Ledger executive warns: the global regulatory landscape may be reshaped

Ledger's Asia-Pacific head Shibayama stated that if the US bans stablecoin yield distribution, it will trigger a new global cryptocurrency regulatory landscape, with some countries potentially introducing more attractive policies. The Asian market focuses more on blockchain infrastructure and tokenization of financial products, while large institutions show less interest in direct cryptocurrency asset investments. As regulation improves, institutional investors are becoming more cautious when selecting custodial service providers.

GateNews2h ago

Boris Johnson criticizes Bitcoin as a Ponzi scheme, with crypto industry leaders collectively refuting the claim

Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson characterized Bitcoin as a "Ponzi scheme" and warned investors, particularly elderly individuals, to exercise caution using personal examples. Industry figures such as Michael Saylor quickly refuted the claim, pointing out that Bitcoin lacks a centralized operator, which is a key characteristic of Ponzi schemes. These remarks sparked widespread discussion and reignited controversy over the definition of Bitcoin.

MarketWhisper2h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments